On Writing

On Writing And if the paper is rejected, you have to have a better paper to undergo the next venue. It's true that the feedback from reviewers is extraordinarily valuable to you and can allow you to improve the paper. When readers misunderstand the paper, that's at all times no less than partly the author's fault! Even should you assume the readers have missed the point, you will learn how your work can be misinterpreted, and eliminating those ambiguities will enhance the paper. Unless your approach is a small variation on one other method, it's often best to defer the associated work to the tip of the paper. When it comes first, it gives readers the impression that your work is rather by-product. One good way to automate these tasks is by writing a program or creating a script for a build system such as Make or Ant. Your paper may also be written in a textual content formatting language such as LaTeX. In every of these cases, it's necessary to run some exterior command to create a few of the content or to create the final PDF. Do not confuse relative and absolute measurements. For occasion, suppose your medicine cures 30% of sufferers, and the placebo cures 25% of patients. If you do any computations corresponding to ratios, you must internally use the complete precision of your precise measurements, but your paper will report only a restricted number of digits of precision. Choose good names not only for the concepts that you just present in your paper, however for the document supply file. Don't name the file after the conference to which you might be submitting or the 12 months. Even if the paper is accepted, such a reputation will not tell you what the paper is about when when you look over your recordsdata in later years. They have spent considerable time and power to provide you suggestions (even when it doesn't appear to you that they have!), and you ought to be grateful and courteous in return. You do not want to make glaringly apparent that you just spent far more time and house on one reviewer than one other. After you submit a paper, do not cease engaged on it! For instance, you would possibly broaden the experiments, improve the implementation, or make other adjustments. Even in case your paper is accepted, you need the accepted version to be as spectacular as possible. However, you must get suggestions from other scientists before submitting for publication. You will waste the time of hard-working reviewers, who will give you suggestions that you could have obtained in other methods. A rule of thumb is to submit only in case you are proud for the world to associate your name with the work, in its current type. Instead, give the paper or its folder/listing a reputation that reflects its content material. Another profit is that this will also lead you to think about the paper by way of its content material and contributions. Do not use a single term to refer to multiple ideas. If you utilize the time period “technique” for each final thought that you simply introduce in your paper, then readers will turn into confused. In general, you must err on the facet of submitting too late rather than too early. That method, you won't muddle inboxes with many revisions, and readers can at all times get the most recent copy. Be considerate to your reviewers, who are spending their time that will help you. If you know of serious criticisms that reviewers would possibly increase, then do not submit the paper. You should not submit your paper too early, when it does not replicate properly on you and a submission would waste the group's reviewing assets. You mustn't submit your paper too late, as a result of then the group is deprived of your scientific insights. This is a place that use of synonyms to differentiate ideas that are unrelated is acceptable. For occasion, you might all the time use “part” when describing an algorithm however “step” when describing how a user uses a software. Give every idea in your paper a descriptive name to make it extra memorable to readers. Never use terms like “method 1”, “strategy 2”, or “our approach”, and keep away from acronyms when attainable. If you doc and automate these steps, then you can easily regenerate the paper when wanted. This is helpful if you re-run experiments or evaluation, or if you have to defend your results in opposition to a criticism by other researchers. If you allow some steps guide, you then or your colleagues are highly likely to make a mistake or to be unable to breed your outcomes later. Your paper probably consists of tables, bibliographies, or other content material that is generated from external knowledge. You might report that your drugs's cure price is .three, the placebo's remedy rate is .25, and your medication's remedy rate is either .05 higher or 20% higher. Just as you have to accurately use “a hundred and twenty% more” versus “one hundred twenty% as many”, you should correctly use “3 occasions sooner than” versus “3 times as fast as”. A associated, additionally frequent, confusion is between “3 occasions sooner than and 3 instances as quick as”. And, “2 times fewer” makes absolutely no sense. “Half as many” is a much better substitute for “2 times fewer”.